BANK CAPITAL & CREDIT CONDITIONS · SEPTEMBER 24, 2026

Basel Review Finds Large-Bank Capital and Liquidity Ratios Above Minimums

The Basel Committee's latest monitoring report found stable large-bank capital ratios, a 136.6% average liquidity coverage ratio, and a 2.2% estimated increase in Tier 1 minimum required capital under full final-rule phase-in.

Bank risk and commercial-finance professionals reviewing capital, liquidity, and credit conditions
PFCS INSIGHTSBasel Review Finds Large-Bank Capital and Liquidity Ratios Above Minimums

What the September 23 report covers

Source publication date: September 23, 2026. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision summarized data as of December 31, 2025, from 149 banks: 106 large internationally active Group 1 banks, including 29 global systemically important banks, and 43 Group 2 banks. The exercise uses confidential submissions from banks and national supervisors and assumes full implementation of final Basel III requirements without modeling future profitability or behavioral responses.

PFCS VISUAL BRIEFBasel III monitoring
136.6%average Group 1 bank liquidity coverage ratio
  1. 01149 banks in the sample
  2. 02Group 1 CET1 held at 13.9%
  3. 03All sampled banks exceeded 100% LCR and NSFR
Educational visual · Transaction terms and lender requirements vary.

Capital ratios were stable while final rules still add requirements

For the unbalanced Group 1 sample, the average Common Equity Tier 1 ratio under the current framework remained 13.9% from June 2025. The Committee estimated that full phase-in of final Basel III standards would increase Tier 1 minimum required capital by 2.2% for Group 1 banks and 0.7% for Group 2 banks. The sample showed a cumulative capital shortfall of €1.4 billion under the final framework, concentrated among non-G-SIB Group 1 and Group 2 banks.

Liquidity measures remained above regulatory thresholds

The weighted average liquidity coverage ratio was 136.6% for Group 1 banks and 196.4% for Group 2 banks at year-end 2025. The weighted average net stable funding ratio was 123.3% and 134.4%, respectively. Every bank in the sample reported both ratios above 100%. These are aggregate international monitoring results; they do not describe every U.S. lender's balance sheet, portfolio appetite, deposit base, pricing, or credit policy.

Practical borrower takeaway

Do not infer that strong system-level ratios guarantee abundant or inexpensive credit for a specific transaction. Maintain current interim statements, tax returns, debt schedules, covenant calculations, liquidity evidence, collateral support, and a clear repayment narrative. Ask each prospective lender about product appetite, hold size, deposit expectations, structure, pricing, and timing, and preserve an alternative funding path. Institution-specific capacity and borrower-specific risk still determine approval and terms.

PFCS borrower takeaway

Borrowers should treat system-level capital strength as context, not a credit promise, and keep complete financials, covenant support, liquidity, collateral, and multiple financing options ready.

Discuss a financing need →

This independent summary is based on the cited source and is provided for general educational purposes only. Terms and program requirements may change.