BANK CAPITAL & CREDIT CONDITIONS · SEPTEMBER 19, 2026

Fed Outlines Final Phase of Bank Stress-Testing Reforms

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said the Federal Reserve will soon consider final stress-testing revisions intended to increase model transparency and reduce year-to-year volatility in stress-capital-buffer requirements.

Bank risk officers reviewing stress-test scenarios and lending portfolio resilience
PFCS INSIGHTSFed Outlines Final Phase of Bank Stress-Testing Reforms

What the September 18 remarks preview

Source publication date: September 18, 2026. Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman said the Federal Reserve Board will consider final revisions to its supervisory stress-testing framework in the coming weeks. Her remarks describe anticipated Board consideration and her views; they are not a commercial credit program or an approval decision for any borrower.

PFCS VISUAL BRIEFBank stress-test reform
2 yearsproposed averaging period for test results
  1. 01More model transparency
  2. 02Lower capital-buffer volatility
  3. 03Lending outcomes remain bank-specific
Educational visual · Transaction terms and lender requirements vary.

Two reforms focus on transparency and volatility

Bowman described a transparency rule that would publish detailed model equations, variables, coefficients, assumptions, limitations, and scenario-design information. She also described averaging each bank’s two most recent annual stress-test results when determining its stress capital buffer and moving the buffer’s effective date from October 1 to January 1. According to the remarks, the combined approach would reduce year-to-year buffer volatility by half without materially changing aggregate required capital.

Stress tests connect resilience with continued lending

Supervisory stress tests estimate losses, revenue, and capital under hypothetical severe conditions to assess whether large banks can absorb losses and continue lending. Bowman also discussed future forward-looking exercises for firm-specific financial and nonfinancial risks, including scenario analysis and reverse stress testing; she said those exercises would inform supervision rather than directly alter capital requirements. Final rules, models, and implementation details remain subject to Board action.

Practical borrower takeaway

Do not assume more predictable bank capital requirements will automatically expand credit or change a current term sheet. A bank still prices and structures each loan around its funding, portfolio concentrations, risk appetite, capital, collateral, borrower profile, and policy. Strengthen the request with reconciled interim statements, realistic cash flow, a current debt schedule, supportable collateral information, covenant calculations, and a downside case showing how debt service and liquidity hold up under stress.

PFCS borrower takeaway

Borrowers should treat the reforms as bank-capital context—not a forecast of easier credit—and continue preparing lender-specific cash-flow, collateral, leverage, covenant, and downside evidence.

Discuss a financing need →

This independent summary is based on the cited source and is provided for general educational purposes only. Terms and program requirements may change.